Macbor ATV CX 100 vs Barossa Mini AK3 (2009)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Macbor ATV CX 100stacks up against the Barossa Mini AK3. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Macbor ATV CX 100 | Barossa Mini AK3 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2009 | 2009 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Weight | — | 58 kg |
| Fuel capacity | 1.3 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | — |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake). Optional disk | Expanding brake (drum brake). No front brake. |
| Tires | — | 45/70-6 / 45/70-6 |
Macbor ATV CX 100 vs Barossa Mini AK3 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Macbor ATV CX 100 and the Barossa Mini AK3 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Macbor ATV CX 100 brings its published horsepower, while the Barossa Mini AK3 counters with its own power figure at 58 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: