Macbor ATV CX 200 vs Barossa MAM 170 (2009)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Macbor ATV CX 200stacks up against the Barossa MAM 170. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Macbor ATV CX 200 | Barossa MAM 170 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2009 | 2009 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 164 cc | 165 cc |
| Weight | 156 kg | 170 kg |
| Fuel capacity | 2.1 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | — | 21/7-10 / 21/10-8 |
Macbor ATV CX 200 vs Barossa MAM 170 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Macbor ATV CX 200 and the Barossa MAM 170 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Macbor ATV CX 200 brings its published horsepower in a 156 kg package, while the Barossa MAM 170 counters with its own power figure at 170 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: