Macbor XC512 T vs Lem Recreational CX2 (2009)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Macbor XC512 Tstacks up against the Lem Recreational CX2. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Macbor XC512 T | Lem Recreational CX2 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2009 | 2007 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 3 hp |
| Weight | — | 34 kg |
| Seat height | 26 mm | 24 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 0.9 L | 0.5 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 1-speed | 1-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
Macbor XC512 T vs Lem Recreational CX2 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Macbor XC512 T and the Lem Recreational CX2 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Macbor XC512 T brings its published horsepower, while the Lem Recreational CX2 counters with 3 hp at 34 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: