MBK Booster 13-inch Naked vs Gilera Runner SP 50 (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the MBK Booster 13-inch Nakedstacks up against the Gilera Runner SP 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | MBK Booster 13-inch Naked | Gilera Runner SP 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2012 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 3 hp | 4 hp |
| Torque | 4 Nm | 5 Nm |
| Weight | 75 kg | — |
| Seat height | 30 mm | 32 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.4 L | 1.9 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Hydraulic with Ø 220 mm stainless steel disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc. Hydraulic with Ø 175 mm stainless steel disc |
| Tires | 120/70-13 / 130/70-13 | 120/70-14 / 140/60-13 |
MBK Booster 13-inch Naked vs Gilera Runner SP 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the MBK Booster 13-inch Naked and the Gilera Runner SP 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the MBK Booster 13-inch Naked brings 3 hp in a 75 kg package, while the Gilera Runner SP 50 counters with 4 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: