MBK Booster Naked vs Clipic QT9 49 (2009)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the MBK Booster Nakedstacks up against the Clipic QT9 49. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | MBK Booster Naked | Clipic QT9 49 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2009 | 2009 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 3 hp | — |
| Torque | 4 Nm | — |
| Weight | 267 kg | 85 kg |
| Seat height | 30 mm | 30 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.4 L | 1.3 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/90-10 / 150/80-10 | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 |
MBK Booster Naked vs Clipic QT9 49 — which should you buy?
Picking between the MBK Booster Naked and the Clipic QT9 49 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the MBK Booster Naked brings 3 hp in a 267 kg package, while the Clipic QT9 49 counters with its own power figure at 85 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: