MBK Booster Naked vs Giantco Cyclop 50 (2009)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the MBK Booster Nakedstacks up against the Giantco Cyclop 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | MBK Booster Naked | Giantco Cyclop 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2009 | 2009 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 3 hp | 5 hp |
| Torque | 4 Nm | 5 Nm |
| Weight | 267 kg | 77 kg |
| Seat height | 30 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 1.4 L | 0.9 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | — |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/90-10 / 150/80-10 | 3.00-10 / 3.00-10 |
MBK Booster Naked vs Giantco Cyclop 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the MBK Booster Naked and the Giantco Cyclop 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the MBK Booster Naked brings 3 hp in a 267 kg package, while the Giantco Cyclop 50 counters with 5 hp at 77 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: