MBK Booster Naked vs Yamaha Aerox R (2017)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the MBK Booster Nakedstacks up against the Yamaha Aerox R. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | MBK Booster Naked | Yamaha Aerox R |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2009 | 2017 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 3 hp | 3 hp |
| Torque | 4 Nm | 4 Nm |
| Weight | 267 kg | — |
| Seat height | 30 mm | 32 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.4 L | 1.9 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Hydraulic. |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc. Hydraulic. |
| Tires | 120/90-10 / 150/80-10 | 130/60-13 / 140/60-13 |
MBK Booster Naked vs Yamaha Aerox R — which should you buy?
Picking between the MBK Booster Naked and the Yamaha Aerox R usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the MBK Booster Naked brings 3 hp in a 267 kg package, while the Yamaha Aerox R counters with 3 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: