MBK Booster vs PGO PMS-50 (2016)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the MBK Boosterstacks up against the PGO PMS-50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | MBK Booster | PGO PMS-50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2007 | 2016 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 3 hp | 5 hp |
| Torque | 4 Nm | 5 Nm |
| Weight | — | 82 kg |
| Fuel capacity | 1.4 L | 1.8 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Disc, Ø 180 | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake). Drum, Ø 110 | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/90-10 / 150/80-10 | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 |
MBK Booster vs PGO PMS-50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the MBK Booster and the PGO PMS-50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the MBK Booster brings 3 hp, while the PGO PMS-50 counters with 5 hp at 82 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: