MBK Cityliner 125 vs Kymco Dink 125 (2009)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the MBK Cityliner 125stacks up against the Kymco Dink 125. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | MBK Cityliner 125 | Kymco Dink 125 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2009 | 2008 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 125 cc | 125 cc |
| Horsepower | 14 hp | 12 hp |
| Torque | 12 Nm | 10 Nm |
| Weight | 159 kg | 140 kg |
| Seat height | 31 mm | 31 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.8 L | 2.4 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | — | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 120/70-16 / 140/70-15 | 120/70-13 / 140/70-12 |
MBK Cityliner 125 vs Kymco Dink 125 — which should you buy?
Picking between the MBK Cityliner 125 and the Kymco Dink 125 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the MBK Cityliner 125 brings 14 hp in a 159 kg package, while the Kymco Dink 125 counters with 12 hp at 140 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: