MBK Flame X vs Peugeot JetForce Compressor (2007)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the MBK Flame Xstacks up against the Peugeot JetForce Compressor. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | MBK Flame X | Peugeot JetForce Compressor |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2007 | 2007 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 125 cc | 125 cc |
| Horsepower | 11 hp | — |
| Torque | 9 Nm | — |
| Weight | 116 kg | 149 kg |
| Seat height | 31 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 1.9 L | 2.1 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | — |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Disc, ø 216 | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake). Drum, Ø 150 | Single disc |
| Tires | 110/70-12 / 120/70-12 | 130/60-13 / 130/60-13 |
MBK Flame X vs Peugeot JetForce Compressor — which should you buy?
Picking between the MBK Flame X and the Peugeot JetForce Compressor usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the MBK Flame X brings 11 hp in a 116 kg package, while the Peugeot JetForce Compressor counters with its own power figure at 149 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: