Mikilon CD125A vs Husqvarna WR125 (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Mikilon CD125Astacks up against the Husqvarna WR125. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Mikilon CD125A | Husqvarna WR125 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2008 | 2013 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 125 cc | 125 cc |
| Horsepower | 6 hp | — |
| Torque | 8 Nm | — |
| Weight | 65 kg | 101 kg |
| Seat height | 31 mm | 38 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 0.8 L | 2.1 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 4-speed | — |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Wave disc. |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Wave disc. |
| Tires | 2.50-14 / 3.00-12 | 90/90-21 / 120/90-18 |
Mikilon CD125A vs Husqvarna WR125 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Mikilon CD125A and the Husqvarna WR125 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Mikilon CD125A brings 6 hp in a 65 kg package, while the Husqvarna WR125 counters with its own power figure at 101 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: