Mikilon M96-250S vs Xmotos XZP250W (2016)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Mikilon M96-250Sstacks up against the Xmotos XZP250W. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Mikilon M96-250S | Xmotos XZP250W |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2011 | 2016 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 249 cc | 249 cc |
| Horsepower | 17 hp | 17 hp |
| Weight | 98 kg | 115 kg |
| Seat height | 350 mm | 37 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.9 L | 1.5 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 1-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Hydraulic. Two-piston calipers. |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Hydraulic. Two-piston calipers. |
| Tires | 80/100-21 / 110/90-18 | 80/100-21 / 110/100-18 |
Mikilon M96-250S vs Xmotos XZP250W — which should you buy?
Picking between the Mikilon M96-250S and the Xmotos XZP250W usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Mikilon M96-250S brings 17 hp in a 98 kg package, while the Xmotos XZP250W counters with 17 hp at 115 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: