Moto Guzzi California 1400 Custom vs Redneck Worlds Baddest Bagger (2017)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Moto Guzzi California 1400 Customstacks up against the Redneck Worlds Baddest Bagger. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Moto Guzzi California 1400 Custom | Redneck Worlds Baddest Bagger |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2017 | 2014 |
| Price | $15,490 | $34,995 |
| Engine | 1380 cc | 1442 cc |
| Horsepower | 95 hp | — |
| Torque | 120 Nm | — |
| Seat height | 29 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 5.4 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Double disc. ABS. Stainless steel floating discs, 4-piston Brembo radial calipers | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. ABS. Stainless steel fixed disc, 2-piston Brembo floating caliper . | Single disc |
| Tires | 130/70-R18 / 200/60-R16 | 120/90-21 / 300-18 |
Moto Guzzi California 1400 Custom vs Redneck Worlds Baddest Bagger — which should you buy?
Picking between the Moto Guzzi California 1400 Custom and the Redneck Worlds Baddest Bagger usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Moto Guzzi California 1400 Custom brings 95 hp, while the Redneck Worlds Baddest Bagger counters with its own power figure. On price, the Moto Guzzi California 1400 Custom has the lower MSRP.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: