Moto Guzzi California III I vs Highland DirtTrac 950 (2009)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Moto Guzzi California III Istacks up against the Highland DirtTrac 950. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Moto Guzzi California III I | Highland DirtTrac 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 1993 | 2009 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 949 cc | 950 cc |
| Horsepower | 65 hp | 85 hp |
| Torque | 80 Nm | 104 Nm |
| Weight | 250 kg | 129 kg |
| Seat height | 30 mm | 28 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 6.6 L | 2.6 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Dual disc | Single disc. Beringer six piston caliper |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Brembo caliper |
| Tires | — | 120/70-17 / 160/60-17 |
Moto Guzzi California III I vs Highland DirtTrac 950 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Moto Guzzi California III I and the Highland DirtTrac 950 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Moto Guzzi California III I brings 65 hp in a 250 kg package, while the Highland DirtTrac 950 counters with 85 hp at 129 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: