Motowell Retrosa vs Yamaha Aerox Naked (2016)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Motowell Retrosastacks up against the Yamaha Aerox Naked. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Motowell Retrosa | Yamaha Aerox Naked |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2016 | 2016 |
| Price | $1,549 | $2,795 |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | 3 hp |
| Torque | — | 4 Nm |
| Seat height | — | 32 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.3 L | 1.9 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 120/70-12 | 130/60-13 / 140/60-13 |
Motowell Retrosa vs Yamaha Aerox Naked — which should you buy?
Picking between the Motowell Retrosa and the Yamaha Aerox Naked usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Motowell Retrosa brings 4 hp, while the Yamaha Aerox Naked counters with 3 hp. On price, the Motowell Retrosa has the lower MSRP.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: