MuZ 660 Skorpion Traveller vs Honda CX 650 C (reduced effect) (1998)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the MuZ 660 Skorpion Travellerstacks up against the Honda CX 650 C (reduced effect). Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | MuZ 660 Skorpion Traveller | Honda CX 650 C (reduced effect) |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 1998 | 1983 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 660 cc | 673 cc |
| Horsepower | 48 hp | 50 hp |
| Torque | 56 Nm | — |
| Weight | 186 kg | — |
| Seat height | 31 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | — | 3.2 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake |
| Tires | — | 100/90-19 / 140/90-15 |
MuZ 660 Skorpion Traveller vs Honda CX 650 C (reduced effect) — which should you buy?
Picking between the MuZ 660 Skorpion Traveller and the Honda CX 650 C (reduced effect) usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the MuZ 660 Skorpion Traveller brings 48 hp in a 186 kg package, while the Honda CX 650 C (reduced effect) counters with 50 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: