MuZ Saxon Voyager vs BMW R50 OS (1995)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the MuZ Saxon Voyagerstacks up against the BMW R50 OS. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | MuZ Saxon Voyager | BMW R50 OS |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 1995 | 1962 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 494 cc | 494 cc |
| Horsepower | 34 hp | 35 hp |
| Torque | 34 Nm | — |
| Weight | 224 kg | — |
| Seat height | 31 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | — | 6.3 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 4-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake). Duplex full hub |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake | Expanding brake (drum brake). Simplex full hub |
| Tires | — | 3.50-18.00 / 3.50-18.00 |
MuZ Saxon Voyager vs BMW R50 OS — which should you buy?
Picking between the MuZ Saxon Voyager and the BMW R50 OS usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the MuZ Saxon Voyager brings 34 hp in a 224 kg package, while the BMW R50 OS counters with 35 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: