Nipponia Brio 50 vs Kreidler RMC-E 50 (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Nipponia Brio 50stacks up against the Kreidler RMC-E 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Nipponia Brio 50 | Kreidler RMC-E 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2011 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 3 hp | 4 hp |
| Torque | 3 Nm | — |
| Weight | 93 kg | 95 kg |
| Seat height | — | 30 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.0 L | 1.5 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 4-speed | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 2.50-17 / 2.50-17 | 130/70-12 / 130/70-12 |
Nipponia Brio 50 vs Kreidler RMC-E 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Nipponia Brio 50 and the Kreidler RMC-E 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Nipponia Brio 50 brings 3 hp in a 93 kg package, while the Kreidler RMC-E 50 counters with 4 hp at 95 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: