Norton C 652 Combat vs Suzuki GR 650 (2001)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Norton C 652 Combatstacks up against the Suzuki GR 650. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Norton C 652 Combat | Suzuki GR 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2001 | 1989 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 652 cc | 652 cc |
| Horsepower | 50 hp | 50 hp |
| Torque | 57 Nm | — |
| Weight | 158 kg | — |
| Seat height | 30 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | — | 3.2 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake |
| Tires | 110/70-R17 / 160/60-R17 | 100/90-19 / 130/90-16 |
Norton C 652 Combat vs Suzuki GR 650 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Norton C 652 Combat and the Suzuki GR 650 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Norton C 652 Combat brings 50 hp in a 158 kg package, while the Suzuki GR 650 counters with 50 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: