Norton Dunstall vs BMW R12 Twin carb (1969)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Norton Dunstallstacks up against the BMW R12 Twin carb. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Norton Dunstall | BMW R12 Twin carb |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 1969 | 1942 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 745 cc | 745 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 20 hp |
| Weight | — | 185 kg |
| Seat height | 32 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | — | 3.7 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | — | 4-speed |
| Front brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake). Single |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | — | 3.50-19 / 3.5-19 |
Norton Dunstall vs BMW R12 Twin carb — which should you buy?
Picking between the Norton Dunstall and the BMW R12 Twin carb usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Norton Dunstall brings its published horsepower, while the BMW R12 Twin carb counters with 20 hp at 185 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: