Norton MK2A 850 Commando Roadster vs Yamaha MT-09 Sport Tracker (2016)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Norton MK2A 850 Commando Roadsterstacks up against the Yamaha MT-09 Sport Tracker. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Norton MK2A 850 Commando Roadster | Yamaha MT-09 Sport Tracker |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 1974 | 2016 |
| Price | $1,900 | — |
| Engine | 828 cc | 847 cc |
| Horsepower | 60 hp | 115 hp |
| Torque | — | 88 Nm |
| Weight | 188 kg | — |
| Seat height | 31 mm | 34 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 3.0 L | 3.7 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 4-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Double disc. Hydraulic. ABS. |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc. Hydraulic. ABS. |
| Tires | — | 120/70-ZR17 / 180/55-ZR17 |
Norton MK2A 850 Commando Roadster vs Yamaha MT-09 Sport Tracker — which should you buy?
Picking between the Norton MK2A 850 Commando Roadster and the Yamaha MT-09 Sport Tracker usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Norton MK2A 850 Commando Roadster brings 60 hp in a 188 kg package, while the Yamaha MT-09 Sport Tracker counters with 115 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: