Pagsta Wasp 50 vs Keeway Matrix 50 (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Pagsta Wasp 50stacks up against the Keeway Matrix 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Pagsta Wasp 50 | Keeway Matrix 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 3 hp | — |
| Torque | 3 Nm | — |
| Weight | 80 kg | 101 kg |
| Seat height | — | 31 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.3 L | 1.7 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | — | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc |
| Tires | 3.50-10 / 3.50-10 | 120/70-12 / 120/70-12 |
Pagsta Wasp 50 vs Keeway Matrix 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Pagsta Wasp 50 and the Keeway Matrix 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Pagsta Wasp 50 brings 3 hp in a 80 kg package, while the Keeway Matrix 50 counters with its own power figure at 101 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: