Pagsta Wasp 50 vs Qlink Rave 50 (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Pagsta Wasp 50stacks up against the Qlink Rave 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Pagsta Wasp 50 | Qlink Rave 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 3 hp | 3 hp |
| Torque | 3 Nm | 3 Nm |
| Weight | 80 kg | 77 kg |
| Fuel capacity | 1.3 L | 1.6 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | — | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc |
| Tires | 3.50-10 / 3.50-10 | 130/60-13 / 130/60-13 |
Pagsta Wasp 50 vs Qlink Rave 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Pagsta Wasp 50 and the Qlink Rave 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Pagsta Wasp 50 brings 3 hp in a 80 kg package, while the Qlink Rave 50 counters with 3 hp at 77 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: