Peugeot Speedfight 3 Iceblade vs Hyosung Rush 50 (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Peugeot Speedfight 3 Icebladestacks up against the Hyosung Rush 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Peugeot Speedfight 3 Iceblade | Hyosung Rush 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2012 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Weight | 100 kg | 88 kg |
| Seat height | 32 mm | 29 mm |
| Fuel capacity | — | 1.3 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Shuricane front disc brake with radial dual piston | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/60-13 / 130/60-13 | 110/70-12 / 120/90-12 |
Peugeot Speedfight 3 Iceblade vs Hyosung Rush 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Peugeot Speedfight 3 Iceblade and the Hyosung Rush 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Peugeot Speedfight 3 Iceblade brings its published horsepower in a 100 kg package, while the Hyosung Rush 50 counters with its own power figure at 88 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: