PGO EVO G-Max 50 vs MBK MachG AC (2007)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the PGO EVO G-Max 50stacks up against the MBK MachG AC. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | PGO EVO G-Max 50 | MBK MachG AC |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2007 | 2007 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 5 hp | 2 hp |
| Torque | 5 Nm | 2 Nm |
| Weight | 105 kg | 76 kg |
| Seat height | — | 30 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.0 L | 1.5 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | — | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Disc, Ø 190 |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake). Drum, Ø 110 |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 | 110/70-12 / 130/70-12 |
PGO EVO G-Max 50 vs MBK MachG AC — which should you buy?
Picking between the PGO EVO G-Max 50 and the MBK MachG AC usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the PGO EVO G-Max 50 brings 5 hp in a 105 kg package, while the MBK MachG AC counters with 2 hp at 76 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: