PGO M2-50 vs Benelli Pepe 50 (2016)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the PGO M2-50stacks up against the Benelli Pepe 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | PGO M2-50 | Benelli Pepe 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2016 | 2016 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 3 hp | 5 hp |
| Torque | 4 Nm | 4 Nm |
| Weight | 102 kg | 93 kg |
| Seat height | — | 30 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.0 L | 1.6 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Wave disk | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 | 2.50-16 / 2.75-16 |
PGO M2-50 vs Benelli Pepe 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the PGO M2-50 and the Benelli Pepe 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the PGO M2-50 brings 3 hp in a 102 kg package, while the Benelli Pepe 50 counters with 5 hp at 93 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: