PGO PMS-50 vs MBK Booster NG (2016)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the PGO PMS-50stacks up against the MBK Booster NG. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | PGO PMS-50 | MBK Booster NG |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2016 | 2007 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 5 hp | 4 hp |
| Torque | 5 Nm | 4 Nm |
| Weight | 82 kg | 78 kg |
| Seat height | — | 32 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.8 L | 1.7 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Disc, Ø 190 |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake). Drum, Ø 110 |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 | 120/90-10 / 130/90-10 |
PGO PMS-50 vs MBK Booster NG — which should you buy?
Picking between the PGO PMS-50 and the MBK Booster NG usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the PGO PMS-50 brings 5 hp in a 82 kg package, while the MBK Booster NG counters with 4 hp at 78 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: