Pitster Pro X5 140 vs Beta Minicross R150 (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Pitster Pro X5 140stacks up against the Beta Minicross R150. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Pitster Pro X5 140 | Beta Minicross R150 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2013 | 2010 |
| Price | $1,749 | — |
| Engine | 140 cc | 149 cc |
| Weight | 65 kg | 65 kg |
| Seat height | 31 mm | 30 mm |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 4-speed | 4-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic. | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic. | Single disc |
| Tires | 2.50-14 / 80/100-12 | 60/100-14 / 2.75-12 |
Pitster Pro X5 140 vs Beta Minicross R150 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Pitster Pro X5 140 and the Beta Minicross R150 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Pitster Pro X5 140 brings its published horsepower in a 65 kg package, while the Beta Minicross R150 counters with its own power figure at 65 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: