Precision Cycle Works Agressor 300 vs Titan Fat Bobber (2009)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Precision Cycle Works Agressor 300stacks up against the Titan Fat Bobber. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Precision Cycle Works Agressor 300 | Titan Fat Bobber |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2009 | 2009 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 1573 cc | 1573 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 93 hp |
| Torque | — | 144 Nm |
| Seat height | — | 28 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 5.0 L | 3.5 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc. 4 piston Thunder Heart Caliper |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc. 4 piston Thunder Heart Caliper |
| Tires | 90/90-21 / 300-18 | 120/70-21 / 260/40-18 |
Precision Cycle Works Agressor 300 vs Titan Fat Bobber — which should you buy?
Picking between the Precision Cycle Works Agressor 300 and the Titan Fat Bobber usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Precision Cycle Works Agressor 300 brings its published horsepower, while the Titan Fat Bobber counters with 93 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: