Puch VZ 50 3P vs Raleigh Supermatic RM5 (1975)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Puch VZ 50 3Pstacks up against the Raleigh Supermatic RM5. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Puch VZ 50 3P | Raleigh Supermatic RM5 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 1975 | 1964 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | 3 hp | — |
| Fuel capacity | 2.0 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 3-speed | — |
| Front brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Rear brakes | — | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 2.50-17 / 2.75-17 | — |
Puch VZ 50 3P vs Raleigh Supermatic RM5 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Puch VZ 50 3P and the Raleigh Supermatic RM5 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Puch VZ 50 3P brings 3 hp, while the Raleigh Supermatic RM5 counters with its own power figure.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike:

