Puma Apollo 125 vs Kinroad XT125-CB Sword (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Puma Apollo 125stacks up against the Kinroad XT125-CB Sword. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Puma Apollo 125 | Kinroad XT125-CB Sword |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 125 cc | 125 cc |
| Horsepower | 9 hp | 8 hp |
| Torque | — | 8 Nm |
| Weight | 66 kg | — |
| Seat height | 30 mm | 28 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.2 L | 2.1 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 4-speed | — |
| Front brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 3.50-8 / 3.50-8 | 2.75-18 / 3.00-18 |
Puma Apollo 125 vs Kinroad XT125-CB Sword — which should you buy?
Picking between the Puma Apollo 125 and the Kinroad XT125-CB Sword usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Puma Apollo 125 brings 9 hp in a 66 kg package, while the Kinroad XT125-CB Sword counters with 8 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: