Puma CityFly 125 vs Azel Street Bike 125cc (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Puma CityFly 125stacks up against the Azel Street Bike 125cc. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Puma CityFly 125 | Azel Street Bike 125cc |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 125 cc | 125 cc |
| Horsepower | 11 hp | 11 hp |
| Torque | — | 8 Nm |
| Weight | 78 kg | 150 kg |
| Seat height | 30 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 0.9 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 4-speed | — |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 120/70-12 | 1.85-18 / 2.15-18 |
Puma CityFly 125 vs Azel Street Bike 125cc — which should you buy?
Picking between the Puma CityFly 125 and the Azel Street Bike 125cc usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Puma CityFly 125 brings 11 hp in a 78 kg package, while the Azel Street Bike 125cc counters with 11 hp at 150 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: