Puma CityFly 125 vs Cagiva Mito 125 (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Puma CityFly 125stacks up against the Cagiva Mito 125. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Puma CityFly 125 | Cagiva Mito 125 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2009 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 125 cc | 125 cc |
| Horsepower | 11 hp | 9 hp |
| Torque | — | 11 Nm |
| Weight | 78 kg | 125 kg |
| Seat height | 30 mm | 30 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 0.9 L | 3.7 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 4-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Bremo |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc. bremo |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 120/70-12 | 110/70-ZR17 / 150/60-ZR17 |
Puma CityFly 125 vs Cagiva Mito 125 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Puma CityFly 125 and the Cagiva Mito 125 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Puma CityFly 125 brings 11 hp in a 78 kg package, while the Cagiva Mito 125 counters with 9 hp at 125 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: