Puma CityFly 125 vs Derbi GPR 125 4T 4V (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Puma CityFly 125stacks up against the Derbi GPR 125 4T 4V. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Puma CityFly 125 | Derbi GPR 125 4T 4V |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 125 cc | 125 cc |
| Horsepower | 11 hp | 15 hp |
| Weight | 78 kg | 120 kg |
| Seat height | 30 mm | 32 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 0.9 L | 3.4 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 4-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc. radial caliper |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake). Floating caliper |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 120/70-12 | 110/80-17 / 130/70-17 |
Puma CityFly 125 vs Derbi GPR 125 4T 4V — which should you buy?
Picking between the Puma CityFly 125 and the Derbi GPR 125 4T 4V usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Puma CityFly 125 brings 11 hp in a 78 kg package, while the Derbi GPR 125 4T 4V counters with 15 hp at 120 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: