Puma CityFly 125 vs Honda CBR125 (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Puma CityFly 125stacks up against the Honda CBR125. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Puma CityFly 125 | Honda CBR125 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2009 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 125 cc | 125 cc |
| Horsepower | 11 hp | 13 hp |
| Torque | — | 11 Nm |
| Weight | 78 kg | 127 kg |
| Seat height | 30 mm | 31 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 0.9 L | 2.6 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 4-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 120/70-12 | 80/90-M17 / 100/80-M17 |
Puma CityFly 125 vs Honda CBR125 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Puma CityFly 125 and the Honda CBR125 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Puma CityFly 125 brings 11 hp in a 78 kg package, while the Honda CBR125 counters with 13 hp at 127 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: