Puma CityFly 125 vs Lexmoto Apollo 125 (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Puma CityFly 125stacks up against the Lexmoto Apollo 125. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Puma CityFly 125 | Lexmoto Apollo 125 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 125 cc | 125 cc |
| Horsepower | 11 hp | 9 hp |
| Weight | 78 kg | 66 kg |
| Seat height | 30 mm | 30 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 0.9 L | 1.2 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 4-speed | 4-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 120/70-12 | 3.50-8 / 3.50-8 |
Puma CityFly 125 vs Lexmoto Apollo 125 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Puma CityFly 125 and the Lexmoto Apollo 125 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Puma CityFly 125 brings 11 hp in a 78 kg package, while the Lexmoto Apollo 125 counters with 9 hp at 66 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: