Puma Falcon CR125 Cross vs Azel Atila 125 (2011)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Puma Falcon CR125 Crossstacks up against the Azel Atila 125. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Puma Falcon CR125 Cross | Azel Atila 125 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2011 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 125 cc | 125 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | 9 hp |
| Torque | — | 8 Nm |
| Weight | 108 kg | 120 kg |
| Seat height | 38 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 2.1 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | — |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 80/100-21 / 110/100-18 | 1.6-21 / 2.15-18 |
Puma Falcon CR125 Cross vs Azel Atila 125 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Puma Falcon CR125 Cross and the Azel Atila 125 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Puma Falcon CR125 Cross brings 4 hp in a 108 kg package, while the Azel Atila 125 counters with 9 hp at 120 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike:

