Puma Falcon CR125 Cross vs UM DSF 125 (2011)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Puma Falcon CR125 Crossstacks up against the UM DSF 125. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Puma Falcon CR125 Cross | UM DSF 125 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2011 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 125 cc | 125 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | — |
| Weight | 108 kg | 122 kg |
| Seat height | 38 mm | 36 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.1 L | 2.6 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 80/100-21 / 110/100-18 | 3.00-21 / 4.10-18 |
Puma Falcon CR125 Cross vs UM DSF 125 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Puma Falcon CR125 Cross and the UM DSF 125 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Puma Falcon CR125 Cross brings 4 hp in a 108 kg package, while the UM DSF 125 counters with its own power figure at 122 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: