Puma Falcon CR250i Cross vs Alligator VR 2000 Enduro (2011)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Puma Falcon CR250i Crossstacks up against the Alligator VR 2000 Enduro. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Puma Falcon CR250i Cross | Alligator VR 2000 Enduro |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2011 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 250 cc | 250 cc |
| Horsepower | 16 hp | — |
| Weight | 114 kg | 103 kg |
| Seat height | 38 mm | 36 mm |
| Fuel capacity | — | 2.5 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Bremo |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc. bremo |
| Tires | 80/100-21 / 110/100-18 | 90/90-21 / 140/80-18 |
Puma Falcon CR250i Cross vs Alligator VR 2000 Enduro — which should you buy?
Picking between the Puma Falcon CR250i Cross and the Alligator VR 2000 Enduro usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Puma Falcon CR250i Cross brings 16 hp in a 114 kg package, while the Alligator VR 2000 Enduro counters with its own power figure at 103 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: