Puma Falcon CR50 Cross vs Generic Trigger 50 Competition (2011)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Puma Falcon CR50 Crossstacks up against the Generic Trigger 50 Competition. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Puma Falcon CR50 Cross | Generic Trigger 50 Competition |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2011 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | 1 hp |
| Torque | — | 3 Nm |
| Weight | 108 kg | 111 kg |
| Seat height | 38 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | — | 10.0 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | — |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | — |
| Tires | 80/100-21 / 110/100-18 | 90/90-21 / 110/80-18 |
Puma Falcon CR50 Cross vs Generic Trigger 50 Competition — which should you buy?
Picking between the Puma Falcon CR50 Cross and the Generic Trigger 50 Competition usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Puma Falcon CR50 Cross brings 4 hp in a 108 kg package, while the Generic Trigger 50 Competition counters with 1 hp at 111 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: