Puma Falcon CR50 Cross vs HM CRE SIX Comp. 10 (2011)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Puma Falcon CR50 Crossstacks up against the HM CRE SIX Comp. 10. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Puma Falcon CR50 Cross | HM CRE SIX Comp. 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2011 | 2010 |
| Price | — | $4,100 |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | — |
| Weight | 108 kg | 81 kg |
| Seat height | 38 mm | 36 mm |
| Fuel capacity | — | 1.6 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 80/100-21 / 110/100-18 | 80/90-21 / 100/80-18 |
Puma Falcon CR50 Cross vs HM CRE SIX Comp. 10 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Puma Falcon CR50 Cross and the HM CRE SIX Comp. 10 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Puma Falcon CR50 Cross brings 4 hp in a 108 kg package, while the HM CRE SIX Comp. 10 counters with its own power figure at 81 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: