Puma Falcon CR50 Cross vs Rieju MRT Pro 50 (2011)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Puma Falcon CR50 Crossstacks up against the Rieju MRT Pro 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Puma Falcon CR50 Cross | Rieju MRT Pro 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2011 | 2011 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | — |
| Weight | 108 kg | 95 kg |
| Seat height | 38 mm | 36 mm |
| Fuel capacity | — | 1.7 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc. 2-piston. Galfer Wave. |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Galfer Wave. |
| Tires | 80/100-21 / 110/100-18 | 80/90-21 / 110/80-18 |
Puma Falcon CR50 Cross vs Rieju MRT Pro 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Puma Falcon CR50 Cross and the Rieju MRT Pro 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Puma Falcon CR50 Cross brings 4 hp in a 108 kg package, while the Rieju MRT Pro 50 counters with its own power figure at 95 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: