Puma Falcon CR50 Cross vs Xispa EnduCross 50 (2011)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Puma Falcon CR50 Crossstacks up against the Xispa EnduCross 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Puma Falcon CR50 Cross | Xispa EnduCross 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2011 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | 5 hp |
| Weight | 108 kg | — |
| Seat height | 38 mm | 29 mm |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 1-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 80/100-21 / 110/100-18 | — |
Puma Falcon CR50 Cross vs Xispa EnduCross 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Puma Falcon CR50 Cross and the Xispa EnduCross 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Puma Falcon CR50 Cross brings 4 hp in a 108 kg package, while the Xispa EnduCross 50 counters with 5 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: