Puma Falcon CR50 Motard vs Beta RR 50 Motard (2011)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Puma Falcon CR50 Motardstacks up against the Beta RR 50 Motard. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Puma Falcon CR50 Motard | Beta RR 50 Motard |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2011 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | — |
| Weight | 107 kg | 85 kg |
| Seat height | 38 mm | 36 mm |
| Fuel capacity | — | 1.6 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 110/70-17 / 140/70-17 | 110/80-17 / 130/70-17 |
Puma Falcon CR50 Motard vs Beta RR 50 Motard — which should you buy?
Picking between the Puma Falcon CR50 Motard and the Beta RR 50 Motard usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Puma Falcon CR50 Motard brings 4 hp in a 107 kg package, while the Beta RR 50 Motard counters with its own power figure at 85 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: