Puma Falcon CR50 Motard vs Generic Trigger SM 50 (2011)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Puma Falcon CR50 Motardstacks up against the Generic Trigger SM 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Puma Falcon CR50 Motard | Generic Trigger SM 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2011 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | 1 hp |
| Torque | — | 3 Nm |
| Weight | 107 kg | 115 kg |
| Seat height | 38 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | — | 2.6 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 110/70-17 / 140/70-17 | 90/90-21 / 110/80-18 |
Puma Falcon CR50 Motard vs Generic Trigger SM 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Puma Falcon CR50 Motard and the Generic Trigger SM 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Puma Falcon CR50 Motard brings 4 hp in a 107 kg package, while the Generic Trigger SM 50 counters with 1 hp at 115 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: