Puma Rottaler 250 Cross vs Husqvarna WR250 (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Puma Rottaler 250 Crossstacks up against the Husqvarna WR250. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Puma Rottaler 250 Cross | Husqvarna WR250 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2011 | 2013 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 250 cc | 249 cc |
| Horsepower | 21 hp | — |
| Weight | 123 kg | 107 kg |
| Seat height | 36 mm | 39 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.3 L | 2.5 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic | Single disc. Wave disc. |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic | Single disc. Floating disc. |
| Tires | 3.00-21 / 4.10-18 | 90/90-21 / 140/80-18 |
Puma Rottaler 250 Cross vs Husqvarna WR250 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Puma Rottaler 250 Cross and the Husqvarna WR250 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Puma Rottaler 250 Cross brings 21 hp in a 123 kg package, while the Husqvarna WR250 counters with its own power figure at 107 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: