Qingqi Grampus QM250T vs CF Moto Jetmax (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Qingqi Grampus QM250Tstacks up against the CF Moto Jetmax. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Qingqi Grampus QM250T | CF Moto Jetmax |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2013 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 249 cc | 249 cc |
| Horsepower | 19 hp | 22 hp |
| Torque | 19 Nm | 20 Nm |
| Weight | 177 kg | 200 kg |
| Seat height | — | 28 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 3.2 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Double disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc |
| Tires | 120/70-15 / 140/70-14 | 120/70-15 / 140/60-14 |
Qingqi Grampus QM250T vs CF Moto Jetmax — which should you buy?
Picking between the Qingqi Grampus QM250T and the CF Moto Jetmax usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Qingqi Grampus QM250T brings 19 hp in a 177 kg package, while the CF Moto Jetmax counters with 22 hp at 200 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: