Qingqi Grampus QM250T vs PGO G-MAX 250LQ (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Qingqi Grampus QM250Tstacks up against the PGO G-MAX 250LQ. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Qingqi Grampus QM250T | PGO G-MAX 250LQ |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2008 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 249 cc | 249 cc |
| Horsepower | 19 hp | 18 hp |
| Torque | 19 Nm | 19 Nm |
| Weight | 177 kg | — |
| Seat height | — | 32 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 3.2 L | 2.0 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc |
| Tires | 120/70-15 / 140/70-14 | 120/60-13 / 130/60-13 |
Qingqi Grampus QM250T vs PGO G-MAX 250LQ — which should you buy?
Picking between the Qingqi Grampus QM250T and the PGO G-MAX 250LQ usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Qingqi Grampus QM250T brings 19 hp in a 177 kg package, while the PGO G-MAX 250LQ counters with 18 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: