Qingqi Variant QM125T-10R vs MBK Cityliner 125 (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Qingqi Variant QM125T-10Rstacks up against the MBK Cityliner 125. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Qingqi Variant QM125T-10R | MBK Cityliner 125 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2009 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 125 cc | 125 cc |
| Horsepower | 8 hp | 14 hp |
| Torque | 8 Nm | 12 Nm |
| Weight | 160 kg | 159 kg |
| Seat height | — | 31 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.9 L | 2.8 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | — |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc |
| Tires | 130/60-13 / 130/60-13 | 120/70-16 / 140/70-15 |
Qingqi Variant QM125T-10R vs MBK Cityliner 125 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Qingqi Variant QM125T-10R and the MBK Cityliner 125 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Qingqi Variant QM125T-10R brings 8 hp in a 160 kg package, while the MBK Cityliner 125 counters with 14 hp at 159 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: