Qlink Estate 50 vs Keeway Victoria 50 (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Qlink Estate 50stacks up against the Keeway Victoria 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Qlink Estate 50 | Keeway Victoria 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2013 | 2013 |
| Price | $1,650 | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | 3 hp |
| Torque | 4 Nm | 3 Nm |
| Weight | 95 kg | 52 kg |
| Seat height | 31 mm | 31 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.8 L | 0.9 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 | 2.50-17 / 2.50-17 |
Qlink Estate 50 vs Keeway Victoria 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Qlink Estate 50 and the Keeway Victoria 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Qlink Estate 50 brings 4 hp in a 95 kg package, while the Keeway Victoria 50 counters with 3 hp at 52 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: